Them’s The Rules!

The Institute Of Directors on Pall Mall is a bastion of British conservatism, as a friend of mine discovered to his cost.

Martin, a film producer, had arranged to meet with a potential investor at the institute, and arrived in his normal attire of  jacket, shirt, jeans and cowboy boots. He was met at the entrance by a doorman dressed in smart black suit, freshly polished shoes and tie.

“Can I help you sir?” he asked.

Martin explained the purpose of his visit. The doorman looked him up and down with palpable disdain.

“Well I’m afraid you can’t come in dressed like that sir. I’ll page your colleague and he can perhaps meet you here.”

The doorman picked up a phone and after a couple of minutes delay, during which Martin was left standing like a naughty schoolboy, the potential investor was located and came to the phone.

“Hello sir,  I have a Mr Carr to meet you in the lobby.”  said the doorman.

There was a pause.

“Unfortunately not sir, I’m not able to send him up as the gentleman appears to have arrived dressed for a rodeo!”

I laughed at the time, but I wasn’t laughing on Easter Monday, when I suffered a similar public humiliation – but at a football match of all things.

I wanted to go to the Rotherham v Port Vale match, but Easter is ‘family time’ and the only way I could persuade the family to join me was to promise them a seat away from the pie munching, swearing and farting masses in what Roy Keane famously referred to as the ‘prawn sandwiches’ – corporate hospitality.

Now I’m not without social etiquette – I realised that my normal matchday attire, which can best be described as charity shop chic – wasn’t going to do. And so I opted for my alternative middle-aged-man-making-a-bit-of-an-effort look of tailored jacket, business shirt, smart jeans and brogues.

I first realised this wasn’t good enough when  the bloke on the door…dressed in the same black suit, tie and freshly shined shoes as the doorman from the Institute Of Directors, looked me up and down and took me to one side, away from the queue.

“It’s fine for today sir, but for future reference, we have a strict dress code and don’t allow jeans.”

I apologised and thought that was the end of the matter. It wasn’t.  I’d seen the doorman go over to the reception desk and nod in my direction. When I got there, I found out why.

“Is yours the party where someone is wearing jeans?” asked  the lady behind the desk.

From her tone, she may easily have substituted “ is wearing jeans” with “has got dog shit on their shoes.” I admitted that it was, I was the guilty party and that I had already received a telling off.

“Well here’s a letter for you to take away as well” she said.

And indeed there was a letter…the football fans equivalent of a yellow card. One more transgression and I’d be off.

I thought my daughter was going to wet herself laughing, which would have been embarrassing in itself. First her dad had been told off and then he’d been given a letter to take home. She couldn’t resist pointing out that nobody at school had ever thought her behaviour sufficiently unacceptable to send her home with a letter.

It was my own fault of course – I should have read the terms and conditions properly when I booked. It clearly specified that trousers and not jeans, were to be worn. But as we climbed the stairs and entered  the executive suite, I had cause to wonder about the purpose and effectiveness of the rule.

‘Trousers’ is a term that covers a multitude of sins, and almost everyone in the room seemed to have looked at the dress code and thought, “What is the most unstylish raggy-arsed outfit I can wear which still complies with the letter of the code?” Most of the people in there must have known each other – not from previous matches, but from an encounter at the crimplene bargain rail in Marks & Spencer some time around the turn of the century. Even my daughter, who considers me to be one small step up from a tramp, and never misses an opportunity to remind me of the fact, had to concede that I was better dressed than 80% of the people in there.   And yet I was the one with a letter folded sheepishly in the pocket of  my offending jeans.

Rules are tiresome things aren’t they?  They’re tiresome for those creating them and they’re tiresome for those who are expected to comply with them. And it seems like human nature that where there’s a rule,  people will try to find a way around it.

I don’t believe the  football club want to stop people wearing jeans. What they do want,  is for people who use their corporate suite facilities to dress  smartly, and they see the ‘no jeans’ policy as the best way of achieving this. But it clearly doesn’t work. Someone wearing jacket, jeans and good shoes will always look smarter than someone wearing old baggy trousers, ill-fitting shirt and battered loafers. The ‘no jeans’ rule is a proxy for something else, and that something else doesn’t quite equate.

I think there’s a lesson here for any business or enterprise. Put rules in place and they will often have unintended consequences. Some customers will bend the rules in ways you can’t anticipate in advance. Other customers will fall foul of the rules, despite their behaviour not being your intended target. And some prospects will elect  not to deal with you at all, simply because they don’t like your rules.

I’m not suggesting that you have no rules at all…that would never work…but rather that you give careful thought to the overall effect of any rules you do implement, and any likely unintended consequences. Err on the side of having less rules, rather than more, and make sure that any rules you do have are not a false proxy for what you’re trying to achieve.   All other things being equal, the less rules you have the better. Your organisation or enterprise appears all the more customer-friendly, the less rules it has.

So if you have rules and regulations which serve no purpose at all, fail to fulfil the original purpose for which they were intended, or simply appear to tick customers off without making anything better, get rid of them!

Aside from my sartorial faux pax, the corporate hospitality made a pleasant change, which I’ll probably repeat next season. So if you have any idea where I might purchase a pair of trousers that wouldn’t have looked out of place during the Hungarian uprising, and a soup-stained darts players shirt, I’d be very grateful. I want to fit in next time.

Thank you.

John – ‘Yellow Card’- Harrison

P.S  I recently heard Freddie Flintoff  describe the aforementioned Roy Keane  as always looking like he’s trying to find the bloke who crapped in his shoes. Funny and very close to the truth.

14 thoughts on “Them’s The Rules!

  1. Matt

    Try coming to Clifton Lane for the rugby next season,I’m sure you won’t be disappointed.We go out of our way to make people feel welcome,
    Matt.

    Reply
  2. Sidney turner

    Try working for Mercedes Benz it’s like being at school
    Rules & procedure rules & procedure & none of it had any benifits
    Only to look good

    Reply
    1. John Harrison Post author

      Coincidentally I DID work for Merceded Benz for a while a long time ago. I was a bit too young to be aware of the rules at the time though.

      Reply
  3. Tony Sheehan

    You could try Premier man. I purchased a linen jacket and trousers of two different shades of blue for £100. They are nice and comfy, bit mid age trendy and crumple and crease like those other chaps a your footie club. Should fit in well I recon.

    Reply
  4. Edward Whitfield

    I used ti look a bit like your description, only worse. Then I met Penny who was to become my new wife, some 13 years ago.

    I now dress smartly, instead of ‘ragged-arsed’ as you describe.

    The main advantage is that my friends now look up to me instead of down on me, if that is an advantage.

    The main disadvantage is that I have to keep it up!!

    Reply
  5. Anthony Hackett-Jones

    Dear John
    Loved your footie situation. I think I have just the shirt for you.
    It’s not soup-stained, sorry to say, but proudly carries about 45 years’ worth of well spilt Guinness saturations, consequent upon many a club game of rugby. So not darts, alas.
    When last I saw it, it suggested that the horticultural fraternity (and sorority, of course) might like to experiment with it.
    My wife had evil intentions of scrapping it into the polishing rag pile, so with the ardour and speed of an anxious father, I hid it deep in the attic, well away from any such heinous vandalism. I guess the odd mouse or rat may have had a chew by now, but by the sound of it, a few rodent tooth marks might help it to qualify for the Rules.
    Hasta la vista,
    Anthony

    Reply
  6. Roberto

    I had the opposite experience – turned up at a property investors conference for three days wearing a suit and tie… Since I was there to do business, I assumed that everyone else would be similarly attired. You have never seen such a motley collection of sartorial inelegance collected in one room. It didn’t bother me, but some of the other delegates took the mick out of me – very rude… The problem is, I’ve never been able to do casual – it’s either ‘gardening’ or a suit. Guess I’d better get down to Primark before the next event!

    Reply
  7. Robert

    It never ceases to amaze me that jeans are still unacceptable, maybe clubs should relax the rule and say “no blue denim” or “smart jeans only”. I have a pair of black jeans without any studs in them (around the pockets) with smart shoes and shirt you wouldn’t notice them. In fact I wore them at Bristol Rovers FC corporate hospitality and they never flinched, I have also worn them in smart restaurants.

    I have been to the IOD in Pall Mall and they are a stickler for smart, so I don’t think they will ever change or relax their rules.

    The UK has this “class society” issue, whereas in the USA you could walk into anywhere with flip flops, shorts and a Bermuda shirt, but maybe that’s taking too far.

    Reply
  8. Brian Morgan

    Any thug with 25 quid can buy a charity shop suit – it won’t stop him being a thug or behaving like an arse in a civilised place. I bet your jeans cost more, looked better and didn’t stop you behaving like the civilised man you clearly are. Most world leaders = hugely expensive suits and ties; most men of peace = somewhat more casual (Gandhi, Mandela, Lennon, Geldof…).

    Reply
    1. John Harrison Post author

      Reminds me of a joke…

      What do you call a (scouser/geordie/cockney/Glaswegian/Yorkshireman or insert you own insult figure here) in a suit?

      The accused.

      Reply
  9. Peter Baker

    Being a retailer of very good furniture with a 3000ft. Showroom, Marietta mland I have become observers of people. Well, we are both Cabinet Makers by trade! We have noticed the the scruffiest looking blokes wear a suit all the week and the smartly dressed wear overalls. The girls, of course, are always dressed ‘to the nines’, almost without exception. Moral: dress for the occasion or the event. Why be a pillock all your life? Take the rest of the day off!

    Reply
  10. Azeem Diwan

    No need to hit Primark to cram your wardrobe. I too went to a property seminar dressed in ‘smart casual’. I had a turtle neck pullover with a casual leather jacket and a ‘smart, chino. I too found attendees dressed from the stiff necked ones with ties to those in jeans the kind you could swear a builder had thrown away and the dog thought it was his dinner and had a go at it!
    I guess ‘smart casual’ could be a way out but then what exactly is ‘smart casual’?
    One thing though. I wonder how would John have been received at a football match sixty, seventy years ago dressed the way he described. He may have received a letter, but I bet he would be reading it in a…prison!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *